Amazon Loses Another E-Book Publisher, Hates Apple

By: Nate Nelson (Contributing Writer)

and their supporters could not have been pleased when revealed the iBookstore during the rollout presentation for the . Not only did it mark the first major competition to their line, but also ’s revenue plan for e-books was very different, and followed the model of traditional booksellers. In the fallout, as major publishers dispute e-book prices with Amazon and pursue the industry model, it becomes increasingly clear that Amazon will not be sending a Valentine’s Day Card this year.kindle2

HarperCollins, Macmillan, and most recently Hachette are the three major publishers who have abandoned the Amazon model so far. The other two – Penguin and Simon & Schuster – are still operating under current agreements, although industry analysts anticipate they will pursue renegotiation with Amazon as well. All five major publishers have deals in place with Apple to distribute over the iBookstore.

Amazon pays the publisher $15 per book under their model, and then subsidizes the book for $9.99 to consumers. Apple’s iBookstore model allows the publisher to set the price for the book, and then pays Apple 30% of the revenue.

Even though the Amazon model brings more e-book revenue to the publishers when compared to the Apple model, booksellers have long complained that the Amazon model devalues books and hurts the brick-and-mortar retailers. The Apple model puts pricing back in the hands of publishers, which is significant as long as book sales remain strong.apple-logo1

If the Apple iPad booms – the safest bet by far – publishing companies may need to start looking for a comfortable niche for the future. Book sales have remained strong in the face of an online news and social media revolution; at least when compared to newspapers and magazines. But a burgeoning competition between retail giants with massive advertising budgets could finally begin swinging public opinion in favor of e-books.

The bottom line for book lovers is they will be paying more for e-books in the future. Reinforcing the old rule of economics: when large companies conspire to make money, the consumers end up with empty wallets. (Okay, so that’s not really an economic rule as far as I am aware – I just made it up. But it should be.)

(via Computerworld)

has written 24 posts on My Reality Tech



Visit Their Website | Follow on Twitter |

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Amazon Loses Another E-Book Publisher, Hates Apple | My Reality Tech -- Topsy.com

  • Jenna_Ice

    I have to agree with that last statement on the article. When you allow the companies to set the tone, the consumers have to pay the price. Perhaps Apple is doing just that…Moving the power back in the publishers' hands.

  • http://nsnelson.wordpress.com/ Nathan McDuck

    I agree, without question. I am a big, big fan of books, so I have no interest in seeing the same thing happen to this industry that is happening to newspapers and magazines. The only way I can see to keep the status quo is in charging the same for e-books as for print books.

    It does not make sense that we should pay as much for something electronic that costs virtually nothing to produce and store, but that is the price, it seems, for helping keep the print industry healthy.

  • http://www.theshacklocks.com/blog Shack

    Ebooks on Amazon are outrageous. Many cost more than the hardback version does. Ebook should cost less than the softback does on sale.